CodexDominion

Command Console

Executive Suite

  • Why CodexDominion
  • Value Center
  • Pilot Portfolio
  • Benchmarking
  • Evidence Exports
  • ROI Assumptions

Operations

  • Dashboard
  • Command

Platform

  • Modules
  • Knowledge

Solutions

  • Banking

Governance

  • Decisions
  • Workflows
  • Policies
  • Evidence

Risk & Supply

  • Vendors
  • Procurement

Administration

  • Identity Center
  • Observability
  • Trust Center
  • Connectors
  • Users
  • Diagnostics
  • Settings

CodexDominion 5.0

AI Governance Control Plane

Meridian Financial Group

finance · enterprise

Administrator
Back to Pilot Portfolio

Pilot Workspace

The engagement system for this pilot — value, proof, ROI, blockers, and the path to conversion.

PILOT-HELIOS-004

Demo datasetStore: Demo Data

Illustrative pilot dataset — figures model a representative enterprise deployment.

2 metrics live in this mode Switch to live data

Helios Manufacturing Group

DiscoveryIllustrative

Explore governing AI quality-inspection decisions on the production line with traceable evidence.

Manufacturing Sponsor: Karl Vogt Ends Sep 15, 2026 Target conversion Sep 30, 2026

Days remaining

81

To conversion

96d

Pilot Health

36%

Pilot Health Summary

Pilot HealthWhy Pilot Health mattersComposite of criteria, milestones, evidence, engagement, and blocker risk — 0.30×criteria + 0.25×milestones + 0.20×evidence + 0.15×stakeholders + 0.10×(100−blocker_risk)

36%

Low

ROI DemonstratedWhy ROI Demonstrated mattersEnterprise Standard v2.1 · Platform Default

$91k

Low

Evidence CompletenessWhy Evidence Completeness mattersFramework readiness blended with milestone evidence coverage — 0.6 × framework_readiness_avg + 0.4 × milestone_evidence_coverage

45%

Low

Procurement ReadinessWhy Procurement Readiness mattersShare of procurement checklist items complete — complete_procurement_items ÷ total_procurement_items × 100

20%

Low

Conversion LikelihoodWhy Conversion Likelihood mattersWeighted sponsor, procurement, technical, evidence, ROI & contract readiness — 0.25×sponsor + 0.20×procurement + 0.15×technical + 0.15×evidence + 0.15×roi_acceptance + 0.10×contract_readiness

41%

Low

Success Criteria & Milestones

Success Criteria

What the pilot is proving — target vs current.

Map AI workflowsOn Track55%
Target: Documented · Current: In progress · Technical Owner
Govern AI requestsNot Started20%
Target: 100% under policy · Current: Not started · Technical Owner
Define governance policiesOn Track35%
Target: Approved set · Current: Drafting · Compliance Owner
Establish baseline evidenceNot Started10%
Target: First packs · Current: Not started · Compliance OwnerEvidence

Milestone Timeline

Kickoff through contract decision.

  1. KickoffComplete

    Due Jun 10, 2026 · Executive Sponsor · 1 evidence

  2. Workflow MappingIn Progress

    Due Jul 10, 2026 · Technical Owner · 2 evidence artifacts

    • ⚠ Integration confirmation missing
  3. Governance ConfigurationPending

    Due Jul 31, 2026 · Technical Owner · 0 evidence artifacts

  4. Evidence CollectionPending

    Due Aug 20, 2026 · Compliance Owner · 0 evidence artifacts

  5. Executive ReviewPending

    Due Sep 1, 2026 · Executive Sponsor · 0 evidence artifacts

  6. Procurement ReviewPending

    Due Sep 10, 2026 · Procurement Owner · 0 evidence artifacts

  7. Contract DecisionPending

    Due Sep 30, 2026 · Executive Sponsor · 0 evidence artifacts

Stakeholder Map

Stakeholder Map

Who needs to act next — influence-weighted.

50% engaged

Karl VogtAware

Executive Sponsor · high influence · last engaged 9d ago

Needs: Name procurement & compliance owners

Maya LindqvistEngaged

Champion / Technical Owner · high influence · last engaged 5d ago

Needs: Confirm integration scope

UnassignedNot Engaged

Procurement Owner · high influence · last engaged 20d ago

Needs: Be identified and engaged

UnassignedNot Engaged

Compliance Owner · medium influence · last engaged 20d ago

Needs: Be identified and engaged

Ivan PetrucciAware

Security Reviewer · medium influence · last engaged 13d ago

Needs: Plan security review

ROI Progress

Executive ROI BreakdownWhy ROI breakdown mattersCategorized annual value from the shared ROI engine. Every figure traces to a documented formula and your editable assumptions.

Enterprise Standard v2.1 · Platform Default · expected scenario

Low confidence Edit assumptions

Operational Savings

$43,316

Compliance Savings

$13,300

Audit Savings

$15,200

Risk Avoidance

$18,900

Total Annual Value

$90,716

Annual Savings

$71,816

Total Annual Value

$90,716

3-Year Value

$272,148

Payback

11.9 mo

Review formulas, scenarios & sensitivity

Evidence & Export Status

Evidence & Export

Procurement-grade package — reuses the Evidence Export Center.

Evidence completeness45%
No package generated yet — generate one to share with procurement.

Missing evidence

  • CC7.2 — continuous monitoring alerting coverage
  • A1.2 — capacity forecasting documentation
  • MEASURE 2.11 — third-party model drift monitoring
  • A.6.2.4 — AI system impact assessment archive

Unsigned in demo/local mode — SHA-256 content integrity only. Production signing requires an HSM-backed key (PAdES) and RFC 3161 timestamping.

Compliance & Procurement Readiness

Compliance Readiness

Framework readiness with drill-down evidence, controls, and owners.

92%

SOC 2 Type II

Ready

184 evidence · 58/63 controls

95%

NIST AI RMF

Ready

142 evidence · 71/74 controls

89%

ISO/IEC 42001

In Progress

96 evidence · 33/38 controls

96%

HIPAA Security Rule

Ready

121 evidence · 44/46 controls

100%

Internal AI Policy

Ready

67 evidence · 28/28 controls

Procurement Readiness

Procurement asks one question: “Can I buy this?”

9/10 ready

Security Questionnaire

CAIQ + SIG Lite responses

Complete

Architecture Diagram

Reference deployment topology

Complete

Risk Assessment

AI & vendor risk report

Complete

Privacy Documentation

DPA + data-flow inventory

Complete

Evidence Package

Signed ZIP export

Complete

Compliance Reports

SOC 2 / NIST / HIPAA mapping

Complete

Pilot Summary

Objective scorecard

Complete

ROI Report

Savings model

Complete

Deployment Checklist

SSO/SCIM cutover plan

In Progress

Executive Summary

Board-ready brief

Complete

Blockers & Next Actions

Blockers & Risks

What stands between the pilot and conversion.

Procurement & compliance owners unassigned
HighDue Jul 1, 2026

Recommended: Sponsor to name procurement and compliance owners.

Owner: Executive Sponsor · If unresolved: No path to procurement or compliance review.

Integration confirmation missing
MediumDue Jul 5, 2026

Recommended: Confirm MES/SCADA integration scope with plant IT.

Owner: Technical Owner · If unresolved: Blocks workflow mapping completion.

Next Actions

The shortest path to conversion — who does what next.

Identify procurement & compliance owners

Executive Sponsor · due Jul 1, 2026 · Stakeholder plan

HighTo Do

Confirm integration scope

Technical Owner · due Jul 5, 2026 · Architecture Diagram

HighIn Progress

Complete workflow mapping

Technical Owner · due Jul 10, 2026 · Workflow map

MediumIn Progress

Draft governance policies

Compliance Owner · due Jul 20, 2026 · Policy set

MediumTo Do

Conversion Readiness

Conversion ReadinessWhy Conversion readiness matters0.25×sponsor + 0.20×procurement + 0.15×technical + 0.15×evidence + 0.15×roi_acceptance + 0.10×contract_readiness — Demo pilot dataset (illustrative)

Is this pilot ready to become a paid contract?

Low confidence
41%Likely
Sponsor Confidence45%
Procurement Readiness20%
Technical Readiness50%
Evidence Readiness45%
ROI Acceptance40%
Contract Readiness50%

Recommended close motion

Deepen engagement & collect evidence

Early. Focus on stakeholder engagement and evidence collection before pursuing conversion.

Pilot Reports

Pilot Reports

Buyer-ready documents — reuse the shared report & export engines.